This is an old revision of the document!
Maybe Man linguistic Patterns
These Patterns identified by a lack of commitment to one's own experience. The client rarely makes definitive statements, using words like “maybe,” “possibly,” “sort of,” “I guess,” or “it seems like.”
Scaling Question Examples: The Maybe Man
When asked to rate their experience on a scale of 0–10, the “Maybe Man” client avoids a definitive number. A specific number represents a specific state of reality; to maintain dissociation, they must keep the number vague.
| Category | Example Response | Analysis of the Avoidance |
|---|---|---|
| Hedges | “I’d say it’s around a 6, maybe?” | The client offers a vicinity (“around”) rather than a location and turns the statement into a question, seeking validation rather than stating a fact. |
| Qualifiers | “It feels sort of like a 7, or roughly an 8.” | The qualifiers “sort of” and “roughly” blur the edges of the number. The client isn't at 7; they are in the “fog” near 7. |
| Epistemic Markers | “It seems like it could be a 5.” “I guess it might be a 9.” | The client focuses on the *possibility* of the number rather than the reality of it. “It seems” distances the client from the feeling itself. |
| Weasel Words | “I suppose you could call it a 4.” | This removes the client as the owner of the experience. It implies that “you” (the therapist) are calling it a 4, not them. |
| Downtoners | “It's just a bit over 5.” “It's not quite a 10.” | Used to minimize the impact. “Not quite a 10” allows them to hint at the severity without taking responsibility for the crisis of a 10. |
| The Range (Bonus) | “It's between a 4 and an 8.” | (Classic MoM Pattern) The client gives a range to ensure they are never wrong. If the therapist treats a 4, the client says it's an 8, and vice versa. |
Here is a breakdown of the different views used to describe these language patterns, ranging from the technical to the colloquial:
1. Hedges / Hedging (The Primary Term)
This is the most common linguistic term. A “hedge” is a mitigating word or sound used to lessen the impact of an utterance.
- Function: It allows the speaker to avoid making a definite commitment to what they are saying. It softens a statement to make it less absolute.
- Examples: “I think this is the right way,” “It’s sort of difficult.”
- Reference: Hedge (linguistics) - Wikipedia
2. Qualifiers
In grammar, these words are often categorized as qualifiers (a type of grammatical modifier).
- Function: A qualifier is a word that limits or enhances another word's meaning. While “very” and “extremely” are qualifiers that intensify, words like “somewhat,” “possibly,” and “rather” are qualifiers that limit or reduce certainty.
- Reference: Grammatical Modifier - Wikipedia
3. Epistemic Markers (The Technical Term)
Linguists refer to this as epistemic modality.
- Function: This refers to the grammar of “knowing.” These markers signal the speaker's level of confidence or knowledge about the truth of their statement.
- Scale: Language has a scale from “Absolute” (“It is raining”) to “Probable” (“It must be raining”) to “Possible” (“It might be raining”). The “Maybe Man” pattern relies heavily on low-certainty epistemic markers.
- Reference: Epistemic Modality - Wikipedia
4. Weasel Words (The Rhetorical/Colloquial Term)
In the context of the “Patterns of Chronicity”, you might hear this language referred to colloquially as weasel words.
- Function: This term implies an intentional (conscious or unconscious) attempt to create an escape route. Like a weasel sucking the yolk out of an egg while leaving the shell intact, these words suck the meaning and commitment out of a sentence while leaving it grammatically correct.
- Why it matters in therapy: If a client says, “I guess I can try,” they haven't actually promised to do anything. If they fail, they can say, “Well, I only said I guessed I could.”
- Reference: Weasel Word - Wikipedia
5. Downtoners / Softeners
These are specific types of modifiers used to reduce the force of a statement.
- Function: To save face, be polite, or avoid confrontation. For example, “It's a little bit expensive” is a softener for “It is too expensive.”
- Reference: Intensifier (and Downtoners) - Wikipedia
Summary
| Term | Definition & Function | Examples | Wikipedia Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hedges / Hedging | Mitigating words used to lessen the impact of an utterance and avoid definitive commitment. | “I think this is right”, “It's sort of hard” | Hedge (linguistics) |
| Qualifiers | Grammatical modifiers that limit or enhance meaning. In this context, they limit certainty. | “Somewhat”, “Rather”, “Possibly” | Grammatical Modifier |
| Epistemic Markers | Markers of “Epistemic Modality” that signal the speaker's level of confidence or knowledge about the truth of a statement. | “It might be”, “It must be”, “It could be” | Epistemic Modality |
| Weasel Words | A rhetorical term for words that suck the meaning or commitment out of a sentence while leaving it grammatically correct, creating an “escape route.” | “I guess I can”, “It is believed that…” | Weasel Word |
| Downtoners / Softeners | Modifiers used specifically to reduce the force of a statement, often to be polite or save face. | “A little bit expensive”, “Not terribly good” | Intensifier (Downtoners) |
What about MoM ?
This pattern relies on Hedging and Weasel Words to keep the client safely dissociated. As long as the client avoids saying 'I am,' they remain unassociated with their experience. To break this loop, the practitioner must refuse to accept ambiguity. The specific intervention is to frame specificity as a requirement of the therapist, asking: 'I like to be specific. Is it this, or is it that?' This forces the client to choose a definitive position.“