Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
modal_operators_verbs [2024/05/25 07:06] – [Practical Application Transactional Analysis] tom | modal_operators_verbs [2025/01/31 15:02] (current) – [Practical Application in IEMT] tom | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | {{tag> | + | {{tag> |
====== Modal Verbs ====== | ====== Modal Verbs ====== | ||
Line 91: | Line 91: | ||
- | ==== Practical Application in IEMT ==== | + | ===== Practical Application in IEMT ===== |
These linguistic markers often reveal underlying beliefs and cognitive patterns that shape an individual' | These linguistic markers often reveal underlying beliefs and cognitive patterns that shape an individual' | ||
Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | If you do the second variant, you can eventually get a (problematic? | + | If you do the second variant, you can eventually get a negative Core-Value |
Lack of value: “I'm not worthy.”, | Lack of value: “I'm not worthy.”, | ||
Lack of authenticity: | Lack of authenticity: | ||
Lack of ability: “I'm no good.”, or do a lack, wants, needs and or the Patterns. | Lack of ability: “I'm no good.”, or do a lack, wants, needs and or the Patterns. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
Cave: For both ways it is necessary to have a very agreeable person, high status and or good rapport unless you want to train for three stage overreactions. This isn't easy for most clients, especially if it involves very shameful emotions, you may want to use more indirect means. | Cave: For both ways it is necessary to have a very agreeable person, high status and or good rapport unless you want to train for three stage overreactions. This isn't easy for most clients, especially if it involves very shameful emotions, you may want to use more indirect means. | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | </ | ||
> MOs indicate a situation that does not (at the moment) exist (future orientation). | > MOs indicate a situation that does not (at the moment) exist (future orientation). | ||
Line 119: | Line 124: | ||
> Verbally expressed MOs may be incongruent to the (more important) nonverbal [[physiological_state_accessing_cues_psacs|Physiological State Accessing Cues (PSACS)]]. | > Verbally expressed MOs may be incongruent to the (more important) nonverbal [[physiological_state_accessing_cues_psacs|Physiological State Accessing Cues (PSACS)]]. | ||
- | > MOs can lead to correspondent Three Pillar like cycles we can explore. | + | > MOs can lead to correspondent Three Pillar like cycles |
- | ==== Practical Application in Non Violent Communication ==== | + | |
+ | ===== Practical Application in Non Violent Communication | ||
< | < | ||
Line 137: | Line 143: | ||
- | ===How ' | + | ====How ' |
//Unmet Expectations//: | //Unmet Expectations//: | ||
Line 183: | Line 189: | ||
{{ youtube> | {{ youtube> | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | ==== Practical Application in Clean Language ==== | + | ===== Practical Application in Clean Language |
In Clean Language(CL)[([[https:// | In Clean Language(CL)[([[https:// | ||
Line 195: | Line 201: | ||
CL offers an exercise to directly work with statements like these: | CL offers an exercise to directly work with statements like these: | ||
- | (1) identify a metaphor for when you are angry and act inappropriately as a result;\\ | + | - identify a metaphor for when you are angry and act inappropriately as a result;\\ |
- | (2) identify a second metaphor for how you would prefer to respond; | + | |
- | (3) explore how you can convert or evolve the first metaphor into the second;\\ | + | |
- | (4) translate your insights into how you can change your behavior in your everyday life;\\ | + | |
- | (5) rehearse this new behavior. | + | |
For a more in depth exploration please refer to: | For a more in depth exploration please refer to: | ||
Line 212: | Line 218: | ||
- | ==== Practical Application in NLP ==== | + | ===== Practical Application in NLP ===== |
- | === Steve Andreas === | + | ==== Steve Andreas |
Steve Andreas writes [(: | Steve Andreas writes [(: | ||
Line 222: | Line 228: | ||
</ | </ | ||
- | === Robert Dilts: Changing Belief Systems With NLP === | + | ==== Robert Dilts: Changing Belief Systems With NLP ==== |
With Robert Dilts' | With Robert Dilts' | ||
Line 252: | Line 258: | ||
In Transactional Analysis, a modal operator (MO) of necessity, such as " | In Transactional Analysis, a modal operator (MO) of necessity, such as " | ||
- | > From the point of IEMT all three roles are imprints. If you assign a certain feeling to each role you have a three pillars cycle. | + | > From the point of IEMT all three roles are imprints. If you assign a certain feeling to each role you can analyse the emotional chaining. |
==== Analyzing "I Should Not Get Angry" in Transactional Analysis Using the Drama Triangle ==== | ==== Analyzing "I Should Not Get Angry" in Transactional Analysis Using the Drama Triangle ==== |