Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
false_memory_syndrome [2023/01/05 16:12] – [The Ingram Case] tom | false_memory_syndrome [2024/03/15 11:40] (current) – tom | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | {{tag> | ||
==== False Memory Syndrome ==== | ==== False Memory Syndrome ==== | ||
+ | Integral Eye Movement Therapy (IEMT) is a somatic therapy that works primarily by resolving memories of traumatic experience by de-potentiating the emotional component of the experience. It is vital that IEMT Practitioners understand the implications of working with memory. | ||
| | ||
- | |||
- | |||
==== Implicit Suggestion and Leading Questions ==== | ==== Implicit Suggestion and Leading Questions ==== | ||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
False memory is not the same as basic memory failures. While we are all susceptible to memory fallibility, | False memory is not the same as basic memory failures. While we are all susceptible to memory fallibility, | ||
- | One way that false memories can form is via questions that are loaded with implicit suggestions and/or presupposition that suggest certain events may have happened. Despite the question taking the form of being “just a question” and elicitation of information, | + | One way that false memories can form is via questions that are loaded with implicit suggestions and/or presupposition that suggest certain events may have happened. Despite the question taking the form of being “just a question” and elicitation of information, |
+ | |||
A question asked of a witness in a manner that suggests the answer sought by the questioner (e.g. “You threw the brick through the window, didn't you?”) or that assumes the existence of disputed facts to which the witness is to testify. Leading questions may not be asked during examination-in-chief (except relating to formal matters, such as the witness' | A question asked of a witness in a manner that suggests the answer sought by the questioner (e.g. “You threw the brick through the window, didn't you?”) or that assumes the existence of disputed facts to which the witness is to testify. Leading questions may not be asked during examination-in-chief (except relating to formal matters, such as the witness' | ||
+ | Further examples of leading questions: | ||
+ | |||
+ | - " | ||
+ | - " | ||
+ | - " | ||
+ | - "Did you really mean to break that vase?" | ||
+ | - "You don't have any plans for the weekend, do you?" | ||
+ | |||
+ | Leading questions are those that suggest a particular answer or contain a biased or loaded phrase. They can be used to influence or manipulate the person being questioned, and they can make it difficult for the person to give a genuine or unbiased response. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In British law, the use of leading questions in law courts is generally not allowed during direct examination, | ||
+ | |||
+ | During direct examination, | ||
+ | |||
+ | However, during cross-examination, | ||
+ | |||
+ | It is up to the judge to decide whether a particular question is a leading question and whether it is appropriate to allow it in court. The judge has the discretion to disallow any questions that they feel are inappropriate or that could unduly influence the witness' | ||
==== The Ingram Case ==== | ==== The Ingram Case ==== | ||
Line 50: | Line 68: | ||
- | It’s been said that when someone is lying, they tend to narrate specific details to make you believe them. Our brain functions similarly to a computer, storing anything we feed it. If we provide it incorrect information, | + | It’s been said that when someone is lying, they tend to narrate specific details to make you believe them. Our brain functions similarly to a computer, storing anything we feed it. If we provide it incorrect information, |
Sometimes we may mix components of many experiences in our memory to form a single one. When we recollect a memory, we are recalling past experiences. However, the chronology has become jumbled or muddled as a result of the collection of events that have now formed a single recollection in your mind. | Sometimes we may mix components of many experiences in our memory to form a single one. When we recollect a memory, we are recalling past experiences. However, the chronology has become jumbled or muddled as a result of the collection of events that have now formed a single recollection in your mind. | ||
Line 94: | Line 113: | ||
< | < | ||
"Not all cases of false memory arise from therapeutic practice. Increasingly, | "Not all cases of false memory arise from therapeutic practice. Increasingly, | ||
- | < | + | < |
authors | authors | ||
title : Recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse Implications for clinical practice | title : Recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse Implications for clinical practice | ||
Line 225: | Line 244: | ||
< | < | ||
</ | </ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== " | ||
+ | <WRAP right rightalign> | ||
+ | " | ||
+ | authors | ||
+ | title : Making Monsters: False Memories, Psychotherapy, | ||
+ | publisher : Scribner | ||
+ | published : 1994 | ||
+ | isbn : 0520205839 | ||
+ | url : https:// | ||
+ | )] is a 1994 book by Richard Ofshe and Ethan Watters. Richard Ofshe is an American social psychologist known for his work on false confessions and coercive persuasion/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Making Monsters explores how certain interrogation tactics, belief systems, and societal influences can shape people' | ||
+ | <WRAP clear/> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== " | ||
+ | <WRAP right rightalign> | ||
+ | " | ||
+ | authors | ||
+ | title : Victims of Memory: Sex Abuse Accusations and Shattered Lives | ||
+ | publisher : Hinesburg VT | ||
+ | published : 1996 | ||
+ | isbn : 0-942679-18-0 | ||
+ | url : https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | In " | ||
+ | |||
+ | Pendergrast discusses how these accusations of sexual abuse led to legal and personal consequences for both the accused and the accusers. The book also delves into the broader societal and psychological factors that played a role in the widespread belief in repressed memories during that era. | ||
+ | |||
+ | <WRAP center> {{ youtube> | ||
+ | |||
+ | Mark Pendergrast, | ||
+ | <WRAP clear/> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== " | ||
+ | <WRAP right rightalign> | ||
+ | " | ||
+ | authors | ||
+ | title : Suggestions of abuse : true and false memories of childhood sexual trauma | ||
+ | publisher : Simon & Schuster | ||
+ | published : 1994 | ||
+ | isbn : 0671874314 | ||
+ | url : https:// | ||
+ | )] is a book by Michael Yapko, a clinical psychologist and expert in hypnosis. The book explores the phenomenon of recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse, and argues that many of these memories are false. Yapko contends that false memories can be created through a variety of factors, including suggestive questioning by therapists, exposure to media reports of abuse, and the desire to believe that one has been abused. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The book was published in 1994, at a time when there was a growing public awareness of the issue of childhood sexual abuse. However, there was also a great deal of controversy surrounding the issue, with some people believing that recovered memories were always accurate, and others believing that they were often false. Yapko' | ||
+ | |||
+ | The book has been praised by some for its balanced and objective approach, and for its contribution to the debate on recovered memories. However, it has also been criticized by some for its skepticism of recovered memories. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Here are some of the key points that Yapko makes in the book: | ||
+ | |||
+ | - Recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse are often unreliable. | ||
+ | - There is no scientific evidence to support the claim that repressed memories can be recovered. | ||
+ | - False memories can be created through a variety of factors, including suggestive questioning, | ||
+ | - Therapists should be cautious about accepting recovered memories as accurate. | ||
+ | - People who believe that they may have been abused as children should seek professional help to evaluate their memories. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Suggestions of Abuse is a controversial book, but it is an important contribution to the debate on recovered memories. The book provides a balanced and objective overview of the issue, and it raises important questions about the reliability of recovered memories. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Michael Yapko is a clinical psychologist and expert in hypnosis and is a past president of the American Society of Clinical Hypnosis. He has written ten books as sole author, including Breaking the Patterns of Depression and Hand-Me-Down Blues. Michael Yapko is a recipient of the Lifetime Achievement Award from the International Society of Hypnosis. | ||
+ | <WRAP clear/> | ||
+ | |||
==== The British False Memory Society (BFMS) ==== | ==== The British False Memory Society (BFMS) ==== | ||
Line 238: | Line 319: | ||
The British False Memory Society (BFMS) closed its operations in 2022 due to changing membership and lack of resources. Founded in 1993, the society endeavored to provide help, advice and support to anyone who felt they had been impacted by False Memory Syndrome or a related issue circulating in media and scientific discussion at the time. The organisation brought together a great deal of research on false memory impacts, with information emanating from victims and carers, legal professionals, | The British False Memory Society (BFMS) closed its operations in 2022 due to changing membership and lack of resources. Founded in 1993, the society endeavored to provide help, advice and support to anyone who felt they had been impacted by False Memory Syndrome or a related issue circulating in media and scientific discussion at the time. The organisation brought together a great deal of research on false memory impacts, with information emanating from victims and carers, legal professionals, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Similarities between Rapid-onset gender dysphoria (ROGD) and Repressed Memories Syndrome | ||
+ | <WRAP CENTER 50%> | ||
+ | {{youtube> | ||
+ | </ | ||
+ | |||