Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
aphantasia [2024/08/27 09:40] – andrewtaustin | aphantasia [2025/01/11 14:47] (current) – [Aphantasia] tom | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
====== Aphantasia ====== | ====== Aphantasia ====== | ||
- | **Aphantasia** is a neurological condition | + | {{ : |
+ | |||
+ | Apart from this framing it is e.g. possible that a weak or absent ability to have imagined visual sensations is balanced by a heightened resistance to intrusive thoughts [(Neuroscience2024> | ||
+ | |||
+ | The most current state of neurological insight is that People with aphantasia still have a blueprint for mental imagery, even if they can’t consciously ‘see’ it. “People with aphantasia actually do seem to have images of a sort, they remain too weak or distorted to become conscious or be measured by our standard measurement techniques” [( : | ||
+ | authors | ||
+ | title : Mind blindness decoded: people who can’t see with their ‘mind’s eye’ still activate their visual cortex, study finds | ||
+ | publisher : UNSW | ||
+ | published : January 2025 | ||
+ | url : https:// | ||
+ | )][( : | ||
+ | authors | ||
+ | title : Imageless imagery in aphantasia revealed by early visual cortex decoding | ||
+ | publisher : Current Biology | ||
+ | published : January 2025 | ||
+ | url : https:// | ||
+ | )] | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Controversies in Diagnosis and Debate on Validity ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The diagnosis of aphantasia has sparked considerable debate within the scientific and medical communities. While some researchers argue that aphantasia is a genuine neurological condition, others question its validity, proposing that it may be more of a subjective experience or an extreme end of a spectrum of visual imagery abilities. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The most current state of neurological insight is that People with aphantasia still have a blueprint for mental imagery, even if they can’t consciously ‘see’ it. “People with aphantasia actually do seem to have images of a sort, they remain too weak or distorted to become conscious or be measured by our standard measurement techniques” [( : | ||
+ | authors | ||
+ | title : Mind blindness decoded: people who can’t see with their ‘mind’s eye’ still activate their visual cortex, study finds | ||
+ | publisher : UNSW | ||
+ | published : January 2025 | ||
+ | url : https:// | ||
+ | )][( : | ||
+ | authors | ||
+ | title : Imageless imagery in aphantasia revealed by early visual cortex decoding | ||
+ | publisher : Current Biology | ||
+ | published : January 2025 | ||
+ | url : https:// | ||
+ | )] | ||
===== Formal Definition ===== | ===== Formal Definition ===== | ||
- | **Aphantasia** is defined as a condition where an individual has a reduced or absent ability to generate voluntary visual imagery. In affected individuals, | + | **Aphantasia** is defined as a condition where an individual has a reduced or absent ability to generate voluntary visual imagery. In affected individuals, |
====Aphantasia and Hyperphantasia - The Continuum of Visual Imagination==== | ====Aphantasia and Hyperphantasia - The Continuum of Visual Imagination==== | ||
- | The terms " | + | The terms " |
While individuals with extreme imagery often experience effects on other forms of imagery like dreams and spatial visualization, | While individuals with extreme imagery often experience effects on other forms of imagery like dreams and spatial visualization, | ||
Line 30: | Line 64: | ||
Scientific research focuses on the relationships between imagery, perception, memory, neurodevelopment, | Scientific research focuses on the relationships between imagery, perception, memory, neurodevelopment, | ||
- | Two significant conclusions have emerged from the scientific study of aphantasia. Firstly, conscious sensory imagery is not a prerequisite for human cognition, challenging Aristotle' | + | Two significant conclusions have emerged from the scientific study of aphantasia. |
+ | * Firstly, conscious sensory imagery is not a prerequisite for human cognition, challenging Aristotle' | ||
+ | * Secondly, creative accomplishments among individuals with aphantasia suggest that sensory imagery is not indispensable for creative imagination, | ||
The marked differences in subjective experience caused by imagery extremes can be expected to have major behavioural effects, e.g. Aphantasia is over-represented among people working in mathematical, | The marked differences in subjective experience caused by imagery extremes can be expected to have major behavioural effects, e.g. Aphantasia is over-represented among people working in mathematical, | ||
Line 48: | Line 84: | ||
)] | )] | ||
- | <WRAP CENTER 50%> | + | ^ Video 1 ^ Video 2 ^ |
- | {{ youtube> | + | | {{youtube> |
- | </ | + | |
- | \\ | + | |
- | \\ | + | |
- | <WRAP CENTER 50%> | + | |
- | {{ youtube> | + | |
- | </ | + | |
===== Controversies in Diagnosis and Debate on Validity ===== | ===== Controversies in Diagnosis and Debate on Validity ===== | ||
The diagnosis of aphantasia has sparked considerable debate within the scientific and medical communities. While some researchers argue that aphantasia is a genuine neurological condition, others question its validity, proposing that it may be more of a subjective experience or an extreme end of a spectrum of visual imagery abilities. | The diagnosis of aphantasia has sparked considerable debate within the scientific and medical communities. While some researchers argue that aphantasia is a genuine neurological condition, others question its validity, proposing that it may be more of a subjective experience or an extreme end of a spectrum of visual imagery abilities. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The most current state of neurological insight is that People with aphantasia still have a blueprint for mental imagery, even if they can’t consciously ‘see’ it. “People with aphantasia actually do seem to have images of a sort, they remain too weak or distorted to become conscious or be measured by our standard measurement techniques” [( : | ||
+ | authors | ||
+ | title : Mind blindness decoded: people who can’t see with their ‘mind’s eye’ still activate their visual cortex, study finds | ||
+ | publisher : UNSW | ||
+ | published : January 2025 | ||
+ | url : https:// | ||
+ | )][( : | ||
+ | authors | ||
+ | title : Imageless imagery in aphantasia revealed by early visual cortex decoding | ||
+ | publisher : Current Biology | ||
+ | published : January 2025 | ||
+ | url : https:// | ||
+ | )] | ||
+ | |||
+ | < | ||
+ | < | ||
+ | |||
+ | Research exploring this phenomenon investigates how differences in visualization abilities affect involuntary imagery and its neural underpinnings. For example, participants were asked either to visualize or to suppress visualization of specific scenarios, like a pink elephant, while their brain activity was monitored using electroencephalography (EEG). The vividness of individuals’ voluntary visualizations correlated with their likelihood of experiencing involuntary imagery, influenced by neural mechanisms tied to disinhibition, | ||
+ | |||
+ | These findings reveal that the strength of involuntary visual experiences often scales with the intensity of one’s capacity for voluntary visualization, | ||
+ | authors | ||
+ | title : Don't think of a pink elephant: Individual differences in visualisation predict involuntary imagery and its neural correlates | ||
+ | publisher : Cortex | ||
+ | published : Volume 183, February 2025, Pages 53-65 | ||
+ | url : https:// | ||
+ | )] | ||
==== Controversy 1: Subjective Experience vs. Neurological Condition ==== | ==== Controversy 1: Subjective Experience vs. Neurological Condition ==== | ||
Line 77: | Line 136: | ||
Whether aphantasia is a " | Whether aphantasia is a " | ||
- | On the other hand, advocates for recognizing | + | On the other hand, advocates for recognising |
^ Issue ^ Position ^ Reference ^ | ^ Issue ^ Position ^ Reference ^ | ||
Line 83: | Line 142: | ||
| Continuum of Imagery Ability | Some researchers see aphantasia as part of a spectrum rather than a distinct condition. | Zeman, A., et al. (2020). Phantasia – The psychological significance of lifelong visual imagery vividness extremes. *Cortex*, 133, 394-406. doi: | | Continuum of Imagery Ability | Some researchers see aphantasia as part of a spectrum rather than a distinct condition. | Zeman, A., et al. (2020). Phantasia – The psychological significance of lifelong visual imagery vividness extremes. *Cortex*, 133, 394-406. doi: | ||
| Existence as a Real Condition | Proponents argue that neuroimaging and consistent cognitive differences support the existence of aphantasia as a real condition. | Zeman, A., Dewar, M., & Della Sala, S. (2015). Lives without imagery – Congenital aphantasia. *Cortex*, 73, 378-380. doi: | | Existence as a Real Condition | Proponents argue that neuroimaging and consistent cognitive differences support the existence of aphantasia as a real condition. | Zeman, A., Dewar, M., & Della Sala, S. (2015). Lives without imagery – Congenital aphantasia. *Cortex*, 73, 378-380. doi: | ||
- | |||
=====IEMT and Aphantasia===== | =====IEMT and Aphantasia===== | ||
Line 97: | Line 155: | ||
< | < | ||
- | I have had some people say they couldn’t | + | I have had some people say they couldn’t |
This was after the emotional loading was reduced. | This was after the emotional loading was reduced. | ||
< | < | ||
Line 103: | Line 161: | ||
< | < | ||
- | Don't ask them to visualise. Just let them talk about the memory or the thought. "Just concentrate on that thought/ | + | Don't ask them to visualize. Just let them talk about the memory or the thought. "Just concentrate on that thought/ |
< | < | ||
</ | </ | ||
Line 110: | Line 168: | ||
* Visualizing is not a prerequisite for doing IEMT. | * Visualizing is not a prerequisite for doing IEMT. | ||
- | * Use the frame " | + | * Use the frame " |
* Dependence on the emotional content - K Pattern / reevaluate. | * Dependence on the emotional content - K Pattern / reevaluate. | ||
* It can be a pointer to a detrimental mindset of the client to this kind of intervention | * It can be a pointer to a detrimental mindset of the client to this kind of intervention | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{ : |